Tuesday, March 25, 2014

blog Post 6

The Loose Change argument was that 9/11 was an government conspiracy covered up to look like a terrorist attack. The 3 conspiracy arguments for this are the sowing distrust, challenging plausibility, and just the government telling a better story. With sowing distrust they are showing distrust in the government. When the governement had flown all of the fighter planes except for 14  out the country for an imaginary military drill in Alaska, and Canada. It was to prepare us for if Russia was to invade us from the North. Another example is when Condaleeza Rice contacted the Mayor of San Francisco telling him dont fly on 9/11. Challenging plausibility is showcased becuase the film challenges the belief that it was a terrorist attack. It was seen that Larry Silverstein took out 3.5 billion insurance policy 6 weeks before 9/11 on the World Trade Center itself. This film is telling a better story becuase its showing how our own government is covering up with terrorist. The first 15 minutes of the film is nothing but conspiracies on what the government is trying to cover up .

No comments:

Post a Comment